Today's blockchain layout has many similarities to earlier networks: it is a "wild West" of heavy, insecure, unregulated and loose connection protocols that seem to struggle to generate the infrastructure for future business. Early critics of Internet technology argued that no one wanted to use E-mail was clearly not true. However, the jury is still out on blockchain.

Practical ease of use is one of the main tests of taking blockchain to the wild West. It is still relatively difficult to use digital currencies for their original financial investment purposes. But more importantly, the broader Web3 ecosystem still lacks the basic functionality and UX to produce the infrastructure that will replace Web2.

Web2 is a well-operated, easy-to-use organism. Think Facebook, Google, Uber, Doordash, and your favorite financial institution app. Digital currency enthusiasts often complain about fragmentation in Web2, but end users see modest features and a great user experience. On the other hand, in Web3, they only see promising fashion trends UX trash fire.

One of the key players behind this stage (and its Web2)IT technology is naturally Microsoft and the Office module. Microsoft Fice has been in virtually every business and home since the late 1990s. Excel for accounting and Outlook for email. The software is so functional that even sharp critics and competitors must use it. Now, we can pretty much say the same thing about Google search. Try to avoid Google products, but you can't stick with it for a week.

Web3 has no Microsoft or Google equivalent. Popular data encryption wallets, such as MetaMask, are often used as portal networks to access the Web3 platform, but are inadequate. So far, interoperability has been the promise of more open projects.

So far, most hyped digital currency projects have focused on Play2-Earn mobile games, crafting Pixel Frogs, or Sun Wukong's NFT. Today, however, the Web3 project has created a very important infrastructure for traditional businesses to enter the market and compete. Infrastructure can take the blockchain beyond the hot spot, because the enterprise that needs the service actually has to be easy to use and guide its test cases. Today, products can work like Web2, but aim to integrate data encryption ecosystems.

For example, a group of former AWS management got together and created Mailchain, which optimizes news delivery in Web3. IT is similar to the most basic email setup and operates like the most basic email setup, but on the platform, for data encryption service projects, IT technology has a rich role in the Web3 space.

Other solutions go further. His overall goal is not just to change the Web2 infrastructure, but to improve its feature features from the source. Such a case is DocumentGPS, one of ShelterZoom's signature solutions. It uses blockchain to identify email accessories and other content.

This extension allows the user to track his email accessories and remove access restrictions even after the recipient has opened the email. It also avoids free downloads and can significantly reduce excessive carbon emissions and information environmental pollution caused by repeated uploads and downloads that upload tens of billions of attachments every day.

In fact, improving email has been Gmail's business for the past decade. With blockchain, however, the field of data encryption could quickly catch up to Google's dominance.

Dispersing engineering construction affects the premise of engineering construction infrastructure

Blockchain creates a new dynamic where you may not need a mainstream professional company like Google or Microsoft to fulfill all the roles of a project. On the other hand, you can have a set of projects within the ecosystem -- in keeping with Web3's struggle to promote democracy.

Ethereum has managed to provide a nice garden for many astonishing projects. However, due to the difficulty of working Bridges safely, and the independence of L2 and the backbone, other software may have higher development potential to become all the places where ecosystems live.

The infrastructure of blockchain technology remains one of its strengths. By not relying on a single authority, the direction and future of systems software will not be driven by narrow interests. Progress can be messy, but chaos can also be seen as a complex way of group discussion. A killer project, and all landscapes with potential for new development will bloom.

For example, Polkadot is designed to facilitate cross-chain interoperability, allowing several Layer-1 solutions to communicate properly, thereby stimulating a robust functional ecosystem. So far, the Polkadot troubles lack a killer app and the project is moving slowly.

Replacing Web2 is a daunting task for any technology. It is questionable whether blockchain exists at all. Eventually, however, the field intensified its efforts. Fashion NFT will continue to dominate today's headlines and imagination, but infrastructure companies will be the ones that steer Web3 into the vortex of public opinion.